It 446,iij4u or jp 447,univision com 448,opendns com 449,marketwatch com. 1567,gumtree co za 1568,nvidia com 1569,pennergame de 1570,prosieben. 8083,antivirusdefense com 8084,mensnet jp 8085,forex com 8086,dianapost. Com 40489,guildwiki de 40490,peredelka tv 40491,manilatonight com 40492.

The Quadro FX 4800 has 192 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce GTS 250 has 128. However, the actual shader performance of the Quadro FX 4800 is 116 and the actual shader performance of the GeForce GTS 250 is 236. The GeForce GTS 250 having 120 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GeForce GTS 250 delivers a noticeably smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the Quadro FX 4800. The GeForce GTS 250 transistor size technology is 10 nm (nanometers) smaller than the Quadro FX 4800. This means that the GeForce GTS 250 is expected to run very slightly cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the Quadro FX 4800. GPU Mini Review Mini Review The Quadro® FX 4800 ultra-high-end solution gives geophysicists, designers, scientists, engineers, and other technical professionals visual computing from their desktops.

Torrent sound packs for logic pro 10. Professional applications take advantage of the Quadro FX 4800 advanced feature set, including 1.5 GB of frame buffer, providing professionals the right set of tools to deliver results that push the realms of visualization. Overview GeForce GTS 250 is a Fast-Middle-Class Graphics Card based on the first revision of the Tesla Architecture. Architecture Tesla was NVIDIA's First Unified Shader Architecture. GPU It equips a GPU Codenamed G92-428-B1 which has 8 Stream Multiprocessors activated and thus offers 128 Shader Processing Units, 64 TMUs and 16 ROPs. The Central Unit is clocked at 738MHz. Memory The GPU accesses a 1GB frame buffer of GDDR3, through a 256-bit memory interface.

The size of the frame buffer is adequate. The Memory Clock Operates at 1100MHz.

Features DirectX 10.0 Support (10.0 Hardware Default) and support for SLI, NVIDIA PureVideo HD Technology, Dual-stream Hardware Acceleration, PhysX, CUDA, HybridPower and other technologies. Cooling Solution The Cooling Solution consists of a Single-Fan. Power Consumption With a rated board TDP of 150W, it requires at least a 450W PSU and it requires at least two 6-pin available connectors. Performance Gaming benchmarks put its performance around of a Radeon HD 4770, meaning it is much faster than Radeon HD 4850.

Recommended CPU - Possible GPU Upgrades - GPU Variants.

Hi all, Yes, I know this is a tough question but I'm building a new system from scratch and am still flipping between video cards. I don't want to spend $1000 on a video card but in reading through all the posts and the knowledge base, the Nvidia Quadro FX is recommended. Saying that, the GeForce appears better (faster) but I don't really know how the Quadro series differs from the GeForce or how it interfaces with VW (Spotlight). Nvidia Quadro FX 580: 512mb GDDR3 128-bit 25.6 GB/sec PCI-E 2.0 32 x CUDA cores Open GL 3.0 DirectX 10 VERSUS Nvidia GeForce GTX 560: 1gb GDDR5 256-bit 128 GB/sec PCI-E 2.0 336 x CUDA cores Open GL 4.2 DirectX 11 Thanks, Dave.

For the GeForce series get the GTX570. Best bang for the buck. Do not know how well if at all VW utilizes Quadro cards. I should think there would be something at VW website about this. All you VW Gurus, please chime in.

Most CAD software uses the CPU for the better /best renderings not the GPU (graphics card). This has been an on going issue with most CAD software. I do hear that ACAD (harumph) does utilize the GPU. This is as it should be. What is the point of spending big money on a great graphics card if the software (CAD) will not utilize it? Imho taoist Edited July 10, 2011 by taoist. Hi Dave As you've noticed, for the similar money, the Geforce is a lot more powerful than a Quadro based on the Cuda Cores (which is the most important).